lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:06:40 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 17/18] KVM: Update Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when
 vCPU is blocked



On 18/09/2015 16:29, Feng Wu wrote:
> This patch updates the Posted-Interrupts Descriptor when vCPU
> is blocked.
> 
> pre-block:
> - Add the vCPU to the blocked per-CPU list
> - Set 'NV' to POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR
> 
> post-block:
> - Remove the vCPU from the per-CPU list
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
> v9:
> - Add description for blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock in Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
> - Check !kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) first, then
>   !irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)
> 
> v8:
> - Rename 'pi_pre_block' to 'pre_block'
> - Rename 'pi_post_block' to 'post_block'
> - Change some comments
> - Only add the vCPU to the blocking list when the VM has assigned devices.
> 
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt |  12 +++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  13 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c                    | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                    |  53 +++++++++---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h              |   3 +
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                   |   3 +
>  6 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
> index d68af4d..19f94a6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt
> @@ -166,3 +166,15 @@ Comment:	The srcu read lock must be held while accessing memslots (e.g.
>  		MMIO/PIO address->device structure mapping (kvm->buses).
>  		The srcu index can be stored in kvm_vcpu->srcu_idx per vcpu
>  		if it is needed by multiple functions.
> +
> +Name:		blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock
> +Type:		spinlock_t
> +Arch:		x86
> +Protects:	blocked_vcpu_on_cpu
> +Comment:	This is a per-CPU lock and it is used for VT-d posted-interrupts.
> +		When VT-d posted-interrupts is supported and the VM has assigned
> +		devices, we put the blocked vCPU on the list blocked_vcpu_on_cpu
> +		protected by blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, when VT-d hardware issues
> +		wakeup notification event since external interrupts from the
> +		assigned devices happens, we will find the vCPU on the list to
> +		wakeup.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 0ddd353..304fbb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -552,6 +552,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	 */
>  	bool write_fault_to_shadow_pgtable;
>  
> +	bool halted;
> +
>  	/* set at EPT violation at this point */
>  	unsigned long exit_qualification;
>  
> @@ -864,6 +866,17 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>  	/* pmu operations of sub-arch */
>  	const struct kvm_pmu_ops *pmu_ops;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Architecture specific hooks for vCPU blocking due to
> +	 * HLT instruction.
> +	 * Returns for .pre_block():
> +	 *    - 0 means continue to block the vCPU.
> +	 *    - 1 means we cannot block the vCPU since some event
> +	 *        happens during this period, such as, 'ON' bit in
> +	 *        posted-interrupts descriptor is set.
> +	 */
> +	int (*pre_block)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +	void (*post_block)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	int (*update_pi_irte)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
>  			      uint32_t guest_irq, bool set);
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 902a67d..9968896 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -879,6 +879,13 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs *, current_vmcs);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, loaded_vmcss_on_cpu);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct desc_ptr, host_gdt);
>  
> +/*
> + * We maintian a per-CPU linked-list of vCPU, so in wakeup_handler() we
> + * can find which vCPU should be waken up.
> + */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock);
> +
>  static unsigned long *vmx_io_bitmap_a;
>  static unsigned long *vmx_io_bitmap_b;
>  static unsigned long *vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy;
> @@ -2985,6 +2992,8 @@ static int hardware_enable(void)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(loaded_vmcss_on_cpu, cpu));
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, cpu));
> +	spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Now we can enable the vmclear operation in kdump
> @@ -6121,6 +6130,25 @@ static void update_ple_window_actual_max(void)
>  			                    ple_window_grow, INT_MIN);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Handler for POSTED_INTERRUPT_WAKEUP_VECTOR.
> + */
> +static void wakeup_handler(void)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> +	spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
> +	list_for_each_entry(vcpu, &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, cpu),
> +			blocked_vcpu_list) {
> +		struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
> +
> +		if (pi_test_on(pi_desc) == 1)
> +			kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, cpu));
> +}
> +
>  static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>  {
>  	int r = -ENOMEM, i, msr;
> @@ -6305,6 +6333,8 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>  		kvm_x86_ops->enable_log_dirty_pt_masked = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(wakeup_handler);
> +
>  	return alloc_kvm_area();
>  
>  out8:
> @@ -10430,6 +10460,126 @@ static void vmx_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * This routine does the following things for vCPU which is going
> + * to be blocked if VT-d PI is enabled.
> + * - Store the vCPU to the wakeup list, so when interrupts happen
> + *   we can find the right vCPU to wake up.
> + * - Change the Posted-interrupt descriptor as below:
> + *      'NDST' <-- vcpu->pre_pcpu
> + *      'NV' <-- POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR
> + * - If 'ON' is set during this process, which means at least one
> + *   interrupt is posted for this vCPU, we cannot block it, in
> + *   this case, return 1, otherwise, return 0.
> + *
> + */
> +static int vmx_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned int dest;
> +	struct pi_desc old, new;
> +	struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
> +
> +	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	vcpu->pre_pcpu = vcpu->cpu;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +			  vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +	list_add_tail(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list,
> +		      &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu,
> +		      vcpu->pre_pcpu));
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +			       vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +
> +	do {
> +		old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We should not block the vCPU if
> +		 * an interrupt is posted for it.
> +		 */
> +		if (pi_test_on(pi_desc) == 1) {
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +					  vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +			list_del(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list);
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(
> +					&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +					vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +			vcpu->pre_pcpu = -1;
> +
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		WARN((pi_desc->sn == 1),
> +		     "Warning: SN field of posted-interrupts "
> +		     "is set before blocking\n");
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Since vCPU can be preempted during this process,
> +		 * vcpu->cpu could be different with pre_pcpu, we
> +		 * need to set pre_pcpu as the destination of wakeup
> +		 * notification event, then we can find the right vCPU
> +		 * to wakeup in wakeup handler if interrupts happen
> +		 * when the vCPU is in blocked state.
> +		 */
> +		dest = cpu_physical_id(vcpu->pre_pcpu);
> +
> +		if (x2apic_enabled())
> +			new.ndst = dest;
> +		else
> +			new.ndst = (dest << 8) & 0xFF00;
> +
> +		/* set 'NV' to 'wakeup vector' */
> +		new.nv = POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR;
> +	} while (cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
> +			new.control) != old.control);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vmx_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
> +	struct pi_desc old, new;
> +	unsigned int dest;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP))
> +		return;
> +
> +	do {
> +		old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
> +
> +		dest = cpu_physical_id(vcpu->cpu);
> +
> +		if (x2apic_enabled())
> +			new.ndst = dest;
> +		else
> +			new.ndst = (dest << 8) & 0xFF00;
> +
> +		/* Allow posting non-urgent interrupts */
> +		new.sn = 0;
> +
> +		/* set 'NV' to 'notification vector' */
> +		new.nv = POSTED_INTR_VECTOR;
> +	} while (cmpxchg(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
> +			new.control) != old.control);
> +
> +	if(vcpu->pre_pcpu != -1) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(
> +			&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +			vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +		list_del(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(
> +			&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock,
> +			vcpu->pre_pcpu), flags);
> +		vcpu->pre_pcpu = -1;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * vmx_update_pi_irte - set IRTE for Posted-Interrupts
>   *
>   * @kvm: kvm
> @@ -10620,6 +10770,9 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = {
>  	.flush_log_dirty = vmx_flush_log_dirty,
>  	.enable_log_dirty_pt_masked = vmx_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked,
>  
> +	.pre_block = vmx_pre_block,
> +	.post_block = vmx_post_block,
> +
>  	.pmu_ops = &intel_pmu_ops,
>  
>  	.update_pi_irte = vmx_update_pi_irte,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 58688aa..46f55b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5869,7 +5869,12 @@ int kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	++vcpu->stat.halt_exits;
>  	if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED;
> +		/* Handle posted-interrupt when vCPU is to be halted */
> +		if (!kvm_x86_ops->pre_block ||
> +				kvm_x86_ops->pre_block(vcpu) == 0) {
> +			vcpu->arch.halted = true;
> +			vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED;
> +		}
>  		return 1;
>  	} else {
>  		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HLT;
> @@ -6518,6 +6523,20 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page(vcpu);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * KVM_REQ_EVENT is not set when posted interrupts are set by
> +	 * VT-d hardware, so we have to update RVI unconditionally.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Update architecture specific hints for APIC
> +		 * virtual interrupt delivery.
> +		 */
> +		if (kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update)
> +			kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu,
> +				kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu));
> +	}
> +
>  	if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) || req_int_win) {
>  		kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
>  		if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED) {
> @@ -6534,13 +6553,6 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			kvm_x86_ops->enable_irq_window(vcpu);
>  
>  		if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Update architecture specific hints for APIC
> -			 * virtual interrupt delivery.
> -			 */
> -			if (kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update)
> -				kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu,
> -					kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu));
>  			update_cr8_intercept(vcpu);
>  			kvm_lapic_sync_to_vapic(vcpu);
>  		}
> @@ -6711,10 +6723,31 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE &&
> -		    !vcpu->arch.apf.halted)
> +		    !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) {
> +			/*
> +			 * For some cases, we can get here with
> +			 * vcpu->arch.halted being true.
> +			 */


Feng,

can you explain what are the reasons for this?

Perhaps pre_block and post_block should be handled entirely in
vcpu_block, like this:

 static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
+	if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) &&
+	    (!kvm_x86_ops->pre_block || kvm_x86_ops->pre_block(vcpu) == 0)) {
 		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 		kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
 		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+		if (kvm_x86_ops->post_block)
+			kvm_x86_ops->post_block(vcpu);
+
 		if (!kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
 			return 1;
 	}

and removing all of your changes in kvm_vcpu_halt and vcpu_run?
(Full patch below my signature, only compile-tested).

It should not matter if mp_state goes briefly to KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED and
from there back to KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE.

Paolo

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4a0b1a800317..5265a5522458 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -568,8 +568,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	 */
 	bool write_fault_to_shadow_pgtable;
 
-	bool halted;
-
 	/* set at EPT violation at this point */
 	unsigned long exit_qualification;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a2a070541318..44092cfa1c0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5674,12 +5674,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	++vcpu->stat.halt_exits;
 	if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) {
-		/* Handle posted-interrupt when vCPU is to be halted */
-		if (!kvm_x86_ops->pre_block ||
-				kvm_x86_ops->pre_block(vcpu) == 0) {
-			vcpu->arch.halted = true;
-			vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED;
-		}
+		vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED;
 		return 1;
 	} else {
 		vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HLT;
@@ -6446,10 +6441,15 @@ out:
 
 static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
+	if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) &&
+	    (!kvm_x86_ops->pre_block || kvm_x86_ops->pre_block(vcpu) == 0)) {
 		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 		kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
 		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+		if (kvm_x86_ops->post_block)
+			kvm_x86_ops->post_block(vcpu);
+
 		if (!kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
 			return 1;
 	}
@@ -6482,28 +6482,9 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	for (;;) {
 		if (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE &&
 		    !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) {
-			/*
-			 * For some cases, we can get here with
-			 * vcpu->arch.halted being true.
-			 */
-			if (kvm_x86_ops->post_block && vcpu->arch.halted) {
-				kvm_x86_ops->post_block(vcpu);
-				vcpu->arch.halted = false;
-			}
-
 			r = vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu);
 		} else {
 			r = vcpu_block(kvm, vcpu);
-
-			/*
-			 * post_block() must be called after
-			 * pre_block() which is called in
-			 * kvm_vcpu_halt().
-			 */
-			if (kvm_x86_ops->post_block && vcpu->arch.halted) {
-				kvm_x86_ops->post_block(vcpu);
-				vcpu->arch.halted = false;
-			}
 		}
 
 		if (r <= 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ