[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55FC88BB.2000608@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:57:15 -0700
From: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] ARM: dts: Put Cygnus core components under core
bus
On 9/18/2015 2:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2015 14:24:09 Ray Jui wrote:
>>
>> + core {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + ranges;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> +
>> + timer@...20200 {
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-global-timer";
>> + reg = <0x19020200 0x100>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gic: interrupt-controller@...21000 {
>>
>
> Could it be that all 'core' components are in the 0x19xxxxxx address range?
> If so, please set up an appropriate ranges property for the bus. Also
> add the address field for the bus according to which addresses are routed
> to it.
>
> Arnd
>
Yes all 'core' components are in the 0x19xxxxx address range for Cygnus.
It's fine and makes sense to set up proper ranges for this bus. But I
might have some issues with the 'soc' components and the 'soc' bus,
which I'll explain and discuss on the next email.
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists