[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150920.003356.1191254663935857851.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 00:33:56 +0900
From: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <marc.zyngier@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ_ONSHOT in forced IRQ setting
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:46:24 +0200
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>>
>> irq thread(runs sdhci_thread_irq()) is waiting on
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c:mmc_wait_for_req_done() in order to access
>> a SDIO register. And, this thread shoud be woken up from
>> sdhci_irq() after the completion of the register access.
>> But, since the IRQ is masked, sdhci_irq() is not called and irq
>> thread can not wake up. This is root cause, I think.
>> What do you think about this?
>
> Ah, that explains it. Let me think about it a bit.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
If something is not clear please let me know.
By the way, even if other issue exists, we should change
irq_setup_forced_threading() as my patch, I think.
Thanks,
Kohji Okuno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists