linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2 118/120] ocfs2: direct write will call ocfs2_rw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:29:18 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@...cle.com>,
	Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 118/120] ocfs2: direct write will call ocfs2_rw_unlock() twice when doing aio+dio

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@...cle.com>

commit aa1057b3dec478b20c77bad07442318ae36d893c upstream.

ocfs2_file_write_iter() is usng the wrong return value ('written').  This
will cause ocfs2_rw_unlock() be called both in write_iter & end_io,
triggering a BUG_ON.

This issue was introduced by commit 7da839c47589 ("ocfs2: use
__generic_file_write_iter()").

Orabug: 21612107
Fixes: 7da839c47589 ("ocfs2: use __generic_file_write_iter()")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ocfs2/file.c |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -2372,6 +2372,20 @@ relock:
 	/* buffered aio wouldn't have proper lock coverage today */
 	BUG_ON(written == -EIOCBQUEUED && !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT));
 
+	/*
+	 * deep in g_f_a_w_n()->ocfs2_direct_IO we pass in a ocfs2_dio_end_io
+	 * function pointer which is called when o_direct io completes so that
+	 * it can unlock our rw lock.
+	 * Unfortunately there are error cases which call end_io and others
+	 * that don't.  so we don't have to unlock the rw_lock if either an
+	 * async dio is going to do it in the future or an end_io after an
+	 * error has already done it.
+	 */
+	if ((written == -EIOCBQUEUED) || (!ocfs2_iocb_is_rw_locked(iocb))) {
+		rw_level = -1;
+		unaligned_dio = 0;
+	}
+
 	if (unlikely(written <= 0))
 		goto no_sync;
 
@@ -2396,20 +2410,6 @@ relock:
 	}
 
 no_sync:
-	/*
-	 * deep in g_f_a_w_n()->ocfs2_direct_IO we pass in a ocfs2_dio_end_io
-	 * function pointer which is called when o_direct io completes so that
-	 * it can unlock our rw lock.
-	 * Unfortunately there are error cases which call end_io and others
-	 * that don't.  so we don't have to unlock the rw_lock if either an
-	 * async dio is going to do it in the future or an end_io after an
-	 * error has already done it.
-	 */
-	if ((ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) || (!ocfs2_iocb_is_rw_locked(iocb))) {
-		rw_level = -1;
-		unaligned_dio = 0;
-	}
-
 	if (unaligned_dio) {
 		ocfs2_iocb_clear_unaligned_aio(iocb);
 		mutex_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_unaligned_aio);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/