[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150919032113.GA24314@linux>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:21:13 -0700
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: of_property_count_u32_elems() can return errors
On 17-09-15, 11:13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > + count = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, "opp-microvolt");
> > + if (count < 0) {
>
> We can't test count for -EINVAL to detect the missing property
> because -EINVAL is also returned on a non-multiple of u32 length
> property? Maybe we shouldn't worry about that case and turn
> -EINVAL into 0.
So you are saying that we go ahead without regulators if a incorrect
values are present in opp-microvolt? i.e. even if the length property
was invalid, we return 0 from this function.
The problem here is that we will try changing the frequency without
changing the regulator in that case, and it might not be safe for the
platform, isn't it?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists