[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150919171749.594565359@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:28:44 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 092/102] of/address: Dont loop forever in of_find_matching_node_by_address().
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
commit 3a496b00b6f90c41bd21a410871dfc97d4f3c7ab upstream.
If the internal call to of_address_to_resource() fails, we end up
looping forever in of_find_matching_node_by_address(). This can be
caused by a defective device tree, or calling with an incorrect
matches argument.
Fix by calling of_find_matching_node() unconditionally at the end of
the loop.
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/of/address.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/of/address.c
+++ b/drivers/of/address.c
@@ -845,10 +845,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_nod
struct resource res;
while (dn) {
- if (of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res))
- continue;
- if (res.start == base_address)
+ if (!of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &res) &&
+ res.start == base_address)
return dn;
+
dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists