[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1442703892-26692-6-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:04:42 -0400
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
ssantosh@...nel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] RDS: increase size of hash-table to 8K
Even with per bucket locking scheme, in a massive parallel
system with active rds sockets which could be in excess of multiple
of 10K, rds_bin_lookup() workload is siginificant because of smaller
hashtable size.
With some tests, it was found that we get modest but still nice
reduction in rds_bind_lookup with bigger bucket.
Hashtable Baseline(1k) Delta
2048: 8.28% -2.45%
4096: 8.28% -4.60%
8192: 8.28% -6.46%
16384: 8.28% -6.75%
Based on the data, we set 8K as the bind hash-table size.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
---
net/rds/bind.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/bind.c b/net/rds/bind.c
index bc6b93e..fb2d545 100644
--- a/net/rds/bind.c
+++ b/net/rds/bind.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct bind_bucket {
struct hlist_head head;
};
-#define BIND_HASH_SIZE 1024
+#define BIND_HASH_SIZE 8192
static struct bind_bucket bind_hash_table[BIND_HASH_SIZE];
static struct bind_bucket *hash_to_bucket(__be32 addr, __be16 port)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists