[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150919180630.GN30445@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:06:30 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: axp20x: Rename supply names for AXP221 DC1SW
and DC5LDO regulators
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The DC1SW and DC5LDO regulators in the AXP221 are internally chained
> to DCDC1 and DCDC5, hence the names. The original bindings used the
> parent regulator names for the supply regulator property. This causes
> some confusion when we actually use it in the dts:
If these regulators are internally always connected to other regulators
in the same device why are we even representing their supplies in DT?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists