| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:06:58 -0700
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"open list\:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER \(MEMCG\)"
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list\:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER \(MEMCG\)"
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.3-rc1 dirty page count underflow (cgroup-related?)
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 11:09 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> I'm not denying the issue, bug the WARNING splat isn't necessarily
>> catching a problem. The corresponding code comes from your debug patch:
>> + WARN_ONCE(__this_cpu_read(memcg->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY]) > (1UL<<30), "MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY bogus");
>>
>> This only checks a single cpu's counter, which can be negative. The sum
>> of all counters is what matters.
>> Imagine:
>> cpu1) dirty page: inc
>> cpu2) clean page: dec
>> The sum is properly zero, but cpu2 is -1, which will trigger the WARN.
>>
>> I'll look at the code and also see if I can reproduce the failure using
>> mem_cgroup_read_stat() for all of the new WARNs.
>
> D'oh. I'll replace those with the proper mem_cgroup_read_stat() and
> test with your patch to see if anything still triggers.
Thanks Dave.
Here's what I think we should use to fix the issue. I tagged this for
v4.2 stable given the way that unpatched performance falls apart without
warning or workaround (besides deleting and recreating affected memcg).
Feedback welcome.
>From f5c39c2e8471c10fe0464ca7b6e6f743ce6920a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:21:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix dirty page migration
The problem starts with a file backed dirty page which is charged to a
memcg. Then page migration is used to move oldpage to newpage.
Migration:
- copies the oldpage's data to newpage
- clears oldpage.PG_dirty
- sets newpage.PG_dirty
- uncharges oldpage from memcg
- charges newpage to memcg
Clearing oldpage.PG_dirty decrements the charged memcg's dirty page
count. However, because newpage is not yet charged, setting
newpage.PG_dirty does not increment the memcg's dirty page count. After
migration completes newpage.PG_dirty is eventually cleared, often in
account_page_cleaned(). At this time newpage is charged to a memcg so
the memcg's dirty page count is decremented which causes underflow
because the count was not previously incremented by migration. This
underflow causes balance_dirty_pages() to see a very large unsigned
number of dirty memcg pages which leads to aggressive throttling of
buffered writes by processes in non root memcg.
This issue:
- can harm performance of non root memcg buffered writes.
- can report too small (even negative) values in
memory.stat[(total_)dirty] counters of all memcg, including the root.
To avoid polluting migrate.c with #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG checks, introduce
page_memcg() and set_page_memcg() helpers.
Test:
0) setup and enter limited memcg
mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test
echo 1G > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cgroup.procs
1) buffered writes baseline
dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1k
sync
grep ^dirty /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.stat
2) buffered writes with compaction antagonist to induce migration
yes 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory &
rm -rf /data/tmp/foo
dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1k
kill %
sync
grep ^dirty /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.stat
3) buffered writes without antagonist, should match baseline
rm -rf /data/tmp/foo
dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1k
sync
grep ^dirty /sys/fs/cgroup/test/memory.stat
(speed, dirty residue)
unpatched patched
1) 841 MB/s 0 dirty pages 886 MB/s 0 dirty pages
2) 611 MB/s -33427456 dirty pages 793 MB/s 0 dirty pages
3) 114 MB/s -33427456 dirty pages 891 MB/s 0 dirty pages
Notice that unpatched baseline performance (1) fell after
migration (3): 841 -> 114 MB/s. In the patched kernel, post
migration performance matches baseline.
Fixes: c4843a7593a9 ("memcg: add per cgroup dirty page accounting")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.2+
Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
mm/migrate.c | 12 +++++++++++-
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 91c08f6f0dc9..80001de019ba 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -905,6 +905,27 @@ static inline void set_page_links(struct page *page, enum zone_type zone,
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg(struct page *page)
+{
+ return page->mem_cgroup;
+}
+
+static inline void set_page_memcg(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ page->mem_cgroup = memcg;
+}
+#else
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg(struct page *page)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline void set_page_memcg(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Some inline functions in vmstat.h depend on page_zone()
*/
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index c3cb566af3e2..6116b8f64d27 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -740,6 +740,15 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
if (PageSwapBacked(page))
SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
+ /*
+ * Indirectly called below, migrate_page_copy() copies PG_dirty and thus
+ * needs newpage's memcg set to transfer memcg dirty page accounting.
+ * So perform memcg migration in two steps:
+ * 1. set newpage->mem_cgroup (here)
+ * 2. clear page->mem_cgroup (below)
+ */
+ set_page_memcg(newpage, page_memcg(page));
+
mapping = page_mapping(page);
if (!mapping)
rc = migrate_page(mapping, newpage, page, mode);
@@ -756,9 +765,10 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
rc = fallback_migrate_page(mapping, newpage, page, mode);
if (rc != MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS) {
+ set_page_memcg(newpage, NULL);
newpage->mapping = NULL;
} else {
- mem_cgroup_migrate(page, newpage, false);
+ set_page_memcg(page, NULL);
if (page_was_mapped)
remove_migration_ptes(page, newpage);
page->mapping = NULL;
--
2.6.0.rc0.131.gf624c3d
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists