linux-kernel - Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55FF7E1F.20004@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:48:47 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
>> Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t
>> TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does
>> that
>> mean these 128 commands are run serially?
>
> Sorry.  It's a script bug, there should be a "&" on the end.  Will fix
> the script.

Ok.

>
>>
>> Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then
>> adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to
>> 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it
>> possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2
>> commits?
>
> Sure.  It is attached with the mail.

Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/