[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56000EE3.7040602@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:06:27 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser
than zero
>> * Reuse of "long int"?
> If you mean adding int to 'unsigned long [long]' types, it does not work.
I am surprised.
> For some reason it works only without adding int after long.
The Coccinelle software should support the term "generic_ctype" from
the SmPL grammar so far, shouldn't it?
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/docs/main_grammar005.html#ctype
>> * Splitting of the suggested SmPL rule so that each source code check
>> will be connected with appropriate warning messages.
> Personally I prefer one message as it is more compact
It might look convenient to combine a few source code checks.
> and fits quite well in both cases,
I got an other impression.
> but I have no strong fillings with separate message for each case.
* v@p < 0
Find places where this condition will always be false.
*v@p >= 0
Find places where this condition will always be true.
Will it help to distinguish these special cases also in your SmPL script
strictly?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists