linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/102] 4.1.8-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150921013629.GA14055@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:36:29 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/102] 4.1.8-stable review

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 07:28:44AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 09/19/2015 10:27 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.8 release.
> > >There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >let me know.
> > >
> > >Responses should be made by Mon Sep 21 17:15:55 UTC 2015.
> > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > 
> > Build results:
> > 	total: 137 pass: 136 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> > 	arm:allmodconfig
> > Qemu test results:
> > 	total: 93 pass: 83 fail: 10
> > Failed tests:
> > 	arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
> > 	arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
> > 	arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
> > 	arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> > 	arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
> > 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
> > 	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
> > 	mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> > 
> > The new failures are all caused by a single new build failure.
> > 
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c: In function 'rockchip_boot_secondary':
> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:155:3: error: 
> > 'rockchip_secondary_startup' undeclared
> > 
> > Caused by 'ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset'.
> 
> It looks like this patch needs to be backported as well :
> 
> commit cb8cc37f4d38d96552f2c52deb15e511cdacf906
> Author: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
> Date:   Mon Jul 6 11:37:23 2015 +0800
> 
>     ARM: rockchip: fix broken build
>     
>     The following was seen in branch[0] build.
>     
>     arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:154:23: error:
>         'rockchip_secondary_startup' undeclared (first use in this function)
>     
>     branch[0]:
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git
>     v4.3-armsoc/soc
>     
>     The broken build is caused by the commit fe4407c0dc58
>     ("ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset").
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
>     
>     The breakage was a result of it being wrongly merged in my branch with
>     the cache invalidation rework from Russell 02b4e2756e01c
>     ("ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache").

Thanks for this, I've queued it up now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/