[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150921152938.GA7356@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:29:38 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] arm-cci: fix handling cpumask_any_but return value
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:33:33PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> cpumask_any_but returns value >= nr_cpu_ids if there are no more CPUs.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 577cc4b..22754d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ static int cci_pmu_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cci_pmu->cpus))
> break;
> target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
> - if (target < 0) // UP, last CPU
> + if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) // UP, last CPU
We could also make target an int, to match the return type of
cpumask_any_but (on top of this change).
Regardless,
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists