linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: da7219: Add bindings documentation for DA7219 audio codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150921164005.GW30445@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:40:05 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Jason Coughlan <jason.coughlan@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: da7219: Add bindings documentation for DA7219
 audio codec

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:36:04AM +0000, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote:
> On September 19, 2015 18:10, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > +- dlg,cp-mchange : Charge pump voltage tracking mode
> > > +	["largest_vol", "dac_vol", "sig_mag"]
> > > +- dlg,cp-vol-thresh : Charge pump volume threshold value (6-bit value)
> > > +	[ 0 - 0x3F ]

> > Why are these in the device tree rather than runtime parameters?

> From previous internal discussions, these seemed to be fire and forget
> parameters, hence their inclusion in the DT binding, rather than as controls.
> Personally didn't see either needing runtime updates.

Make them runtime configurable.  People can do an at boot runtime
configuration if they like.

> 
> > > +Required properties:
> > > +- interrupt-parent : Specifies the phandle of the interrupt controller to which
> > > +  the IRQs from DA7219 AAD block are delivered to.
> > > +- interrupts : IRQ line info for DA7219 AAD block.
> > > +  (See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt for
> > > +   further information relating to interrupt properties)

> > Why is this not specified at the device level (the device does not
> > appear to support other interrupts)?

> Given the way that the driver code was structured, and that the IRQ is only used
> for accessory detection, I added it to the child node. The other option would
> be to flatten out bindings, and remove the child node. Felt like keeping the
> accessory detect items separate though was a sensible approach. What is your
> feeling on this?

The child node is fine for collecting the parameters but the chip
interrupt line should be at the chip level.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)