[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1442866676-10359-6-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:17:56 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] locking/mcs: Use acquire/release semantics
As such, weakly ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use
of barriers when locking/unlocking.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index fd91aaa..5b9102a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
node->locked = 0;
node->next = NULL;
- prev = xchg(lock, node);
+ prev = xchg_acquire(lock, node);
if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
/*
* Lock acquired, don't need to set node->locked to 1. Threads
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
/*
* Release the lock by setting it to NULL
*/
- if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
+ if (likely(cmpxchg_release(lock, node, NULL) == node))
return;
/* Wait until the next pointer is set */
while (!(next = READ_ONCE(node->next)))
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists