[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:19:04 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps
On 9/20/15 6:30 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b ("net: Add support for VRFs to inetpeer cache")
>
>
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/runtime/nr_threads/cluster/test:
> lkp-sbx04/netperf/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/300s/200%/cs-localhost/TCP_CRR
>
> commit:
> 5345c2e12d41f815c1009c9dee72f3d5fcfd4282
> 192132b9a034d87566294be0fba5f8f75c2cf16b
>
Clarification: The reproduce file shows 128 instances of 'netperf -t
TCP_CRR -c -C -l 300 -H 127.0.0.1' without an '&' on the end. Does that
mean these 128 commands are run serially?
Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then
adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to
192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it
possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 commits?
Thanks,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists