[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150921143101.09426cd661fe66e65a1c06b5@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:31:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/38] mm/memblock.c: remove invalid check
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:05 +0200 Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com> wrote:
> Unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_reserved_mem_region(u64 *idx,
> {
> struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.reserved;
>
> - if (*idx >= 0 && *idx < type->cnt) {
> + if (*idx < type->cnt) {
Linus has in the past expressed a preference for retaining checks such
as this. iirc he finds it clearer. And perhaps safer if the type
should change in the future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists