[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56007868.8050605@android.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:36:40 -0700
From: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...ionio.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Morse <James.Morse@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ARM64 readahead: fault retry breaks mmap file read random
detection
On 09/21/2015 02:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 09:39:50PM +0100, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
>> Description from commit 45cac65b0fcd
>> ("readahead: fault retry breaks mmap file read random detection")
>> . . .
>> Yup, arm64 needs this too! Random read improves by 250%, sequential
>> read improves by 40%, and random write by 400% to an eMMC device with
>> dm crypto wrapped around it.
> Thanks for this. This must've gone in whilst we were developing the initial
> version of the arm64 port and has since gone unnoticed.
>
> I'll queue it on the arm64 fixes branch and send a pull request after
> some testing.
>
> Will
As noted, this fix may need to be propagated to all the arch-specific
code, I was not in a position to check this out on arm (32 bit) and the
benchmarking code I used did not immediately port to 32-bit.
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists