[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r3lqp83s.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:27:51 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: samuel@...tiz.org, petr.cvek@....cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: irda: pxaficp_ir: use sched_clock() for time management
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:36:56 +0200
>
>> Which brings me to wonder which is the more correct :
>> (a) replace to reproduce the same calculation
>> Previously mtt was compared to a difference of 76ns steps (as 307ns / 4 =
>> 76ns):
>> while ((sched_clock() - si->last_clk) * 76 < mtt)
>>
>> (b) change the calculation assuming mtt is in microseconds :
>> while ((sched_clock() - si->last_clk) * 1000 < mtt)
>>
>> I have no IRDA protocol knowledge so unless someone points me to the correct
>> calculation I'll try my luck with (b).
>
> "a" would be "safer" and less likely to break anything, although as
> you say "b" might be more correct.
Indeed.
Well, let me try (b) then. I'll add in the commit message the timings change,
and if anybody complains a regression pops out, I'll provide a patch to fallback
to (a).
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists