[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922214507.GK19114@dastard>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 07:45:07 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] VFS: Kill use of O_LARGEFILE inside the kernel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:12:42PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> > So what this means is that on 32-bit systems, if we have a userspace
> > program which isn't using the Largefile-enabled, and it opens a file
> > which is larger than can be addressed with a 32-bit off_t, it can get
> > surprised and possibly cause data loss.
>
> Good point. I was initially thinking that 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit system
> would have O_LARGEFILE automatically enabled - but I guess it'll trap through
> the compat entry points which avoid that.
>
> That said, fanotify and xfs_open_by_handle() will both automatically set
> O_LARGEFILE irrespectively of the 32-bitness of the original caller.
Any binaries that use xfs_open_by_handle() and then don't support
greater than 32bit file offsets are simply broken. No ifs or buts -
if you are using low level XFS specific file access ioctls, you need
to build binaries that support 64 bit offsets.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists