[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922221218.GA9317@x1>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:12:18 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to
pwm_set_period
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless
> call to pwm_set_period, which might mess up with the initial PWM state
> once we have added proper support for PWM init state retrieval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index ae498c1..71944f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -293,12 +293,14 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * period, parsed from the DT, in the PWM device. For the non-DT case,
> * set the period from platform data if it has not already been set
> * via the PWM lookup table.
> + * FIXME: This assignment should be dropped as soon as all the boards
> + * have moved to the PWM lookup table approach. The same goes for the
> + * pb->period field which should be replaced by
> + * pwm_get_default_period() calls.
> */
> pb->period = pwm_get_default_period(pb->pwm);
> - if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0)) {
> + if (!pb->period && (data->pwm_period_ns > 0))
> pb->period = data->pwm_period_ns;
> - pwm_set_period(pb->pwm, data->pwm_period_ns);
> - }
>
> pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (pb->period / pb->scale);
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists