[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922155542.GA2682@linux-q0g1.site>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:55:42 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> @@ -121,11 +130,14 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
>> * lock(wait_lock);
>> * acquire(lock);
>> */
>> - return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
>> + return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, owner, NULL);
>
>Why is this acquire?
Because I am an idiot, that should be a release...
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists