[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5600E12E.4040005@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:03:42 -0700
From: Mark Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: add more checks for disconnected
adapter
On 9/21/15 9:14 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Just switching to adapter->io_addr everywhere seems to not work as
> noted above. :\ Note that I'm also chasing this from the other end
> with the author of the pci patches that seem to have triggered this,
> so the real bug might be over in pci-land, but hardening against
> explosions in igb still seems like a worthwhile effort here.
My understanding is that there can be problems if too many writes to a
removed device happen. That is why ixgbe avoids doing that by testing
for removal in some places. The io_addr does get used in the transmit
path simply to avoid adding a test to that hot path. That approach
seems to be working well for ixgbe.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (868 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists