[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922163922.GV4029@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:39:22 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@...s.com>
Cc: kirill@...temov.name, starvik@...s.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
jespern@...s.com, hughd@...gle.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
minchan@...nel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define
behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages'
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:16:18PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:31:04 +0200
>
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:18:35AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > > I guess you hit the right spot, but I'd think people would be
> > > > more comfortable with aligning to sizeof (void *).
> > >
> > > I would indeed prefer sizeof(void *).
> >
> > Do you prefer to have the attribute set for whole structure or for ->next?
> > I think attribute on ->next is more appropriate from documentation POV.
>
> Speaking of the documentation POV, I'd recommend adding an
> explanatory comment. Here's hoping this was obvious! ;)
What Hans-Peter said! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists