[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922.154238.1965447428094041241.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:42:38 +0900
From: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <msmucr@...il.com>,
<nathan.sullivan@...com>, <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
<okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Handle force threading of irqs with primary
and thread handler
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:01:10 +0200
> To deal with this proper, we need to force thread the primary handler
> of such interrupts as well. That means that the primary interrupt
> handler is treated as any other primary interrupt handler which is not
> marked IRQF_NO_THREAD. The threaded handler becomes a separate thread
> so the SDHCI flow logic can be handled gracefully.
>
> The same issue was reported against 4.1-rt.
Hi tglx,
I tried your patch. It worked good for me.
Many thanks,
Kohji Okuno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists