[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1442944358-1248-8-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:51:03 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 007/102] ipv6: addrconf: validate new MTU before applying it
3.19.8-ckt7 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marcelo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
commit 77751427a1ff25b27d47a4c36b12c3c8667855ac upstream.
Currently we don't check if the new MTU is valid or not and this allows
one to configure a smaller than minimum allowed by RFCs or even bigger
than interface own MTU, which is a problem as it may lead to packet
drops.
If you have a daemon like NetworkManager running, this may be exploited
by remote attackers by forging RA packets with an invalid MTU, possibly
leading to a DoS. (NetworkManager currently only validates for values
too small, but not for too big ones.)
The fix is just to make sure the new value is valid. That is, between
IPV6_MIN_MTU and interface's MTU.
Note that similar check is already performed at
ndisc_router_discovery(), for when kernel itself parses the RA.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index dac9419..167d23e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4879,6 +4879,21 @@ int addrconf_sysctl_forward(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
return ret;
}
+static
+int addrconf_sysctl_mtu(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
+ void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ struct inet6_dev *idev = ctl->extra1;
+ int min_mtu = IPV6_MIN_MTU;
+ struct ctl_table lctl;
+
+ lctl = *ctl;
+ lctl.extra1 = &min_mtu;
+ lctl.extra2 = idev ? &idev->dev->mtu : NULL;
+
+ return proc_dointvec_minmax(&lctl, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+}
+
static void dev_disable_change(struct inet6_dev *idev)
{
struct netdev_notifier_info info;
@@ -5030,7 +5045,7 @@ static struct addrconf_sysctl_table
.data = &ipv6_devconf.mtu6,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = addrconf_sysctl_mtu,
},
{
.procname = "accept_ra",
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists