[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922070259.GG29091@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:02:59 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, pi3orama@....com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Make perf depend on libbpf
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:23:21PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> + NO_LIBBPF := 1
> else
> ifneq ($(filter s% -static%,$(LDFLAGS),),)
> msg := $(error No static glibc found, please install glibc-static);
> @@ -309,6 +312,13 @@ ifndef NO_LIBELF
> $(call detected,CONFIG_DWARF)
> endif # PERF_HAVE_DWARF_REGS
> endif # NO_DWARF
> +
> + ifndef NO_LIBBPF
> + ifeq ($(feature-bpf), 1)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
> + $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBBPF)
what depends on CONFIG_LIBBPF ? I dont see any object being dependent on it
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists