lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150922185426.GC20029@lunn.ch>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 20:54:26 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	pavel@....cz, ospite@...denti.unina.it, davem@...emloft.net,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, ricardo.ribalda@...il.com,
	p.meerwald@...-electronic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] leds: Rename brightness_set_sync op to
 brightness_set_blocking

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:47:42PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> The initial purpose of brightness_set_sync op, introduced along with
> the LED flash class extension, was to add a means for setting torch LED
> brightness as soon as possible, which couldn't have been guaranteed by
> brightness_set op. This patch renames the op to brightness_set_blocking,
> which describes its purpose in a more generic way, and is beneficial
> in view of the prospective changes in the core related to using
> LED core's set_brightness_work for setting brightness for LED class
> drivers that can sleep or use delays while setting brightness.

...

> -	/*
> -	 * Set LED brightness level immediately - it can block the caller for
> -	 * the time required for accessing a LED device register.
> -	 */
> -	int		(*brightness_set_sync)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> -					enum led_brightness brightness);
> +	/* Can sleep or use delays */
> +	int (*brightness_set_blocking)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,

I'm no expert when it comes to flash photography with digital
cameras. But to me the old comment seems better. Doesn't the caller
want to know the flash is now giving out light? The new comment gives
no indication of this, where as the old one does?

   Andrew


>  	/* Get LED brightness level */
>  	enum led_brightness (*brightness_get)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ