[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150923210531.GC29349@fieldses.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:05:31 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 26/41] richacl: Apply the file masks to a richacl
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:40:18PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-23 22:33 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>:
> > The same could be said if there's a group-i-belong-to:rwx::allow entry,
> > do we make that exception too?
>
> We cannot because that would be incorrect for all other group members.
OK. So people have to learn how the group mask works anyway, and now
they have to learn a special exception to that rule.
I don't like having this exception. Or making the richacl->v4acl
translation dependent on the owner.
But I admit it's surprising to that an 0700 mask with
"bfields:rwx::allow" ACL denies access to a bfields-owned file.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists