[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOviyajLPivBQLauYHWTW71PHyvF15X=Ocu8JDc-92s0k3XRwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:42:38 +1000
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: PIDs Controller Limit
Does it make sense for the PIDs controller to allow a user to set a
limit of 0? Since we don't cancel attaches, a limit of 0 doesn't
affect anything (nothing stops attaches, and you need to have a
process in the PIDs cgroup in order for fork()s to be affected by the
limit). So I think that attempting to set pid.limit to 0 should return
an -EINVAL.
--
Aleksa Sarai (cyphar)
www.cyphar.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists