linux-kernel - Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1443055070.8829.36.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:37:50 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:	lkp@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 12:06 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and
> > > then
> > > adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78
> > > to
> > > 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is
> > > it
> > > possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2
> > > commits?
> > 
> 
> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct?
> 
> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between 
> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm?

The kconfig file is attached with the mail.  It appears that
CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

View attachment "config-4.2.0-rc8-01479-g192132b" of type "text/x-mpsub" (140324 bytes)