[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1509240941540.30132@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:57:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux v4.2] workqueue: llvmlinux: acpid: BUG: sleeping function
called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2680
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I am seeing this call-trace when compiling a Linux v4.2.y or Linux
> v4.3-rcN kernel with my llvm-toolchain and llvmlinux-amd64 patchset.
> CLANG sometimes catches things which GCC does not.
>
> Not sure if this is a workqueue or hid issue...
>
> [ 24.824396] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/workqueue.c:2767
> [ 24.824511] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1485, name: acpid
> [ 24.824596] 3 locks held by acpid/1485:
> [ 24.824599] #0: (&evdev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8174a2bc>]
> evdev_release+0xbc/0xf0
> [ 24.824612] #1: (&dev->mutex#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff817419d7>]
> input_close_device+0x27/0x70
> [ 24.824624] #2: (hid_open_mut){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0056388>]
> usbhid_close+0x28/0xb0 [usbhid]
> [ 24.824636] irq event stamp: 7914
> [ 24.824639] hardirqs last enabled at (7913): [<ffffffff8192a2b2>]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x32/0x60
> [ 24.824646] hardirqs last disabled at (7914): [<ffffffff81120e37>]
> del_timer_sync+0x37/0x110
> [ 24.824652] softirqs last enabled at (7220): [<ffffffff818b06a9>]
> local_bh_enable+0x9/0x20
> [ 24.824659] softirqs last disabled at (7218): [<ffffffff818b0689>]
> local_bh_disable+0x9/0x20
> [ 24.824666] CPU: 1 PID: 1485 Comm: acpid Not tainted
> 4.3.0-rc2-3-llvmlinux-amd64 #2
> [ 24.824670] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
> [ 24.824673] ffff8800d4806948 0000000000000096 0000000000000000
> ffff8800b8933bf8
> [ 24.824680] ffffffff8149a4ad ffff8800b8933c28 ffffffff810cd53a
> ffffffff81c56fcc
> [ 24.824686] ffff8801185f4240 0000000000000000 0000000000000acf
> ffff8800b8933c68
> [ 24.824693] Call Trace:
> [ 24.824699] [<ffffffff8149a4ad>] dump_stack+0x7d/0xa0
> [ 24.824705] [<ffffffff810cd53a>] ___might_sleep+0x28a/0x2a0
> [ 24.824709] [<ffffffff810cd23f>] __might_sleep+0x4f/0xc0
> [ 24.824715] [<ffffffff810b01de>] __cancel_work_timer+0x2e/0x270
> [ 24.824720] [<ffffffff8192a252>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x52/0x80
> [ 24.824725] [<ffffffff81120ded>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0xad/0xc0
> [ 24.824730] [<ffffffff810b01a8>] cancel_work_sync+0x18/0x20
Could you please (on a kernel compiled with debuginfo) resolve (using
addr2line) those offsets to source code lines? Especially
__cancel_work_timer+0x2e will be interesting in this case.
__cancel_work_timer() calls try_to_grab_pending() which disabled IRQs, but
as far as I can see, the only way it goes to sleep then is when
try_to_grab_pending() returned -ENOENT, but in such case it reenabled IRQs
explicitly before.
Also the fact that "hardirqs last disabled at (7914): [<ffffffff81120e37>]
del_timer_sync+0x37/0x110" is a bit puzzling as well, but AFAICS
del_timer_sync is complete outside the codepath that's on stack.
[ ... snip ... ]
> >> [ 24.705463] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> >> kernel/workqueue.c:2680
> >> [ 24.705576] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1447, name: acpid
> >> [ 24.705662] 3 locks held by acpid/1447:
> >> [ 24.705664] #0: (&evdev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8173b9ac>]
> >> evdev_release+0xbc/0xf0
> >> [ 24.705678] #1: (&dev->mutex#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81733117>]
> >> input_close_device+0x27/0x70
> >> [ 24.705691] #2: (hid_open_mut){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0056378>]
> >> usbhid_close+0x28/0xb0 [usbhid]
> >> [ 24.705704] irq event stamp: 19968
> >> [ 24.705706] hardirqs last enabled at (19967): [<ffffffff81917ff2>]
> >> _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x32/0x60
> >> [ 24.705713] hardirqs last disabled at (19968): [<ffffffff81120477>]
> >> del_timer_sync+0x37/0x110
> >> [ 24.705720] softirqs last enabled at (18890): [<ffffffff8189e7c9>]
> >> local_bh_enable+0x9/0x20
> >> [ 24.705726] softirqs last disabled at (18888): [<ffffffff8189e7a9>]
> >> local_bh_disable+0x9/0x20
> >> [ 24.705734] CPU: 2 PID: 1447 Comm: acpid Not tainted
> >> 4.2.0-2-llvmlinux-small #2
> >> [ 24.705737] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
> >> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
> >> [ 24.705741] ffff8800d57ea948 0000000000000092 0000000000000000
> >> ffff8800bb3e3aa8
> >> [ 24.705748] ffffffff8149287d ffff8800bb3e3ad8 ffffffff810cbf7a
> >> ffffffff81c51a34
> >> [ 24.705754] ffff8800d3095000 0000000000000000 0000000000000a78
> >> ffff8800bb3e3b18
> >> [ 24.705761] Call Trace:
> >> [ 24.705767] [<ffffffff8149287d>] dump_stack+0x7d/0xa0
> >> [ 24.705774] [<ffffffff810cbf7a>] ___might_sleep+0x28a/0x2a0
> >> [ 24.705779] [<ffffffff810cbc7f>] __might_sleep+0x4f/0xc0
> >> [ 24.705784] [<ffffffff810ae8ff>] start_flush_work+0x2f/0x290
> >> [ 24.705789] [<ffffffff810ae8ac>] flush_work+0x5c/0x80
> >> [ 24.705792] [<ffffffff810ae86a>] ? flush_work+0x1a/0x80
> >> [ 24.705799] [<ffffffff810eddcd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
> >> [ 24.705804] [<ffffffff810ad938>] ? try_to_grab_pending+0x48/0x360
> >> [ 24.705810] [<ffffffff81917e13>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x73/0x80
> >> [ 24.705814] [<ffffffff810aecf9>] __cancel_work_timer+0x179/0x260
This one is even more strange. It says that flush_work() is being called
from __cancel_work_timer() with IRQs disabled, but flags are explicitly
restored just one statement before that, and usbhid_close() explicitly
calls cancel_work_sync() after unconditionally enabling interrupts.
So I am not able to make any sense of either of the traces really.
Are you seeing this with the same .config with GCC-compiled kernel as
well?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists