[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4588e8ab09638458f2451af572827108be3b4a36.1443123796.git.geliangtang@163.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 04:48:53 -0700
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: test_aperfmperf and test_intel should be static
Fixes the following sparse warnings:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c:13:6: warning: symbol
'test_aperfmperf' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c:18:6: warning: symbol
'test_intel' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
index 086b12e..f32ac13 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_msr.c
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ enum perf_msr_id {
PERF_MSR_EVENT_MAX,
};
-bool test_aperfmperf(int idx)
+static bool test_aperfmperf(int idx)
{
return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF);
}
-bool test_intel(int idx)
+static bool test_intel(int idx)
{
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
boot_cpu_data.x86 != 6)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists