[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150924143356.GA8569@lerouge>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:33:57 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...hip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nohz: mark tick_nohz_init_all() as __init
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:58:26PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> It's only called by tick_nohz_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 8d45638..4cc6df03 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int tick_nohz_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -static int tick_nohz_init_all(void)
> +static int __init tick_nohz_init_all(void)
> {
> int err = -1;
For some reasons I thought sections don't apply to static functions. Well I still don't know
but I guess it works as long as the function doesn't get inlined. Or likely it prevents it from
being inlined.
Anyway, I think we can take the patch.
Thanks.
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists