[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150924152727.GB10109@sudip-pc>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:57:27 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] page-flags: rectify forward declaration
> >
> > Also, I'm finding that the patch series introduces a pretty large
> > bisection hole:
> >
> > include/linux/page-flags.h: In function 'PageYoung':
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: implicit declaration of function 'PF_ANY'
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> >
> > which later gets fixed up by
> > page-flags-rectify-forward-declaration.patch.
> How to test this? Should I apply them on top of v4.2 and bisect? And I
> don't see any relation between the first two patches and this patch of
> the series, then how does it fail in bisect? Am I missing something?
> Confused.. :(
> >
> > Maybe it's time to do a wholesale refactoring of the patchset?
> If this patch is the first in the series will that help?
> And besides I got the auto mail from you that the patch is applied.
> Now totally confused.. :(
Ohhh ..all the time you were talking about Kirill's patch set and I kept
thinking you are mentioning about this patchset. :)
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists