[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150924162719.GZ4287@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 18:27:19 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: pullup dbgu rx instead of tx
On 24/09/2015 at 17:22:54 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote :
> I just noticed that other ports have the same problem in sama5d3.dtsi. E.g.
>
> uart1 {
> pinctrl_uart1: uart1-0 {
> atmel,pins =
> <AT91_PIOA 30 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE /* conflicts with TWD0, ISI_VSYNC */
> AT91_PIOA 31 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_PULL_UP>; /* conflicts with TWCK0, ISI_HSYNC */
> };
> };
>
> Given that the original bug I found spread all over the map, it seems
> like someone was confused when the pull-ups were originally added.
> Someone (else?) at Atmel needs to audit this so that pull-ups are
> added on the rx-pins instead of the tx-pins.
>
Sure, that is the plan!
Thanks again for the report.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists