linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: qcom: scm: Peripheral Authentication Service

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:20:05 -0700
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: qcom: scm: Peripheral Authentication Service

On Thu 24 Sep 12:13 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 09/23, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > +
> > +int __qcom_scm_pas_mem_setup(u32 peripheral, phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size)
> 
> Maybe we should make addr and size u32s as well. Kumar requested
> we take the same approach for other scm calls.
> 

So you're saying that on arm64 we're always going to load firmware in
the lower 32 bits of memory?


Not sure what the benefit of doing this conversion higher up in the
layers are, but sure we could do it...

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/