[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150924202503.GA24381@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:25:03 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Refreshed page-flags patchset
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:13:22AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> > As requested, here's reworked version of page-flags patchset.
> > Updated version should fit more naturally into current code base.
>
> This is certainly great for specialized debugging hunting for improper
> handling of page flags for compound pages but a regular debug
> kernel will get a mass of VM_BUG_ON(s) at numerous page flag uses in the
> code. Is that really useful in general for a debug kernel?
As I said before, it was useful for me in few cases.
I can wrap these VM_BUG_ONs under separate config, if it helps.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists