[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150924203445.GH3009@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:34:45 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Use masks and shifts when
converting GFP flags to migrate types
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:52:36AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> #define ___GFP_HIGHMEM 0x02u
> #define ___GFP_DMA32 0x04u
> #define ___GFP_MOVABLE 0x08u
> -#define ___GFP_WAIT 0x10u
> +#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x10u
> #define ___GFP_HIGH 0x20u
> #define ___GFP_IO 0x40u
> #define ___GFP_FS 0x80u
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> #define ___GFP_NOMEMALLOC 0x10000u
> #define ___GFP_HARDWALL 0x20000u
> #define ___GFP_THISNODE 0x40000u
> -#define ___GFP_RECLAIMABLE 0x80000u
> +#define ___GFP_WAIT 0x80000u
> #define ___GFP_NOACCOUNT 0x100000u
> #define ___GFP_NOTRACK 0x200000u
> #define ___GFP_NO_KSWAPD 0x400000u
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
>
> /* This mask makes up all the page movable related flags */
> #define GFP_MOVABLE_MASK (__GFP_RECLAIMABLE|__GFP_MOVABLE)
> +#define GFP_MOVABLE_SHIFT 3
This connects the power-of-two gfp bits to the linear migrate type
enum, so shifting back and forth between them works only with up to
two items. A hypothetical ___GFP_FOOABLE would translate to 4, not
3. I'm not expecting new migratetypes to show up anytime soon, but
this implication does not make the code exactly robust and obvious.
> @@ -152,14 +153,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> /* Convert GFP flags to their corresponding migrate type */
> static inline int gfpflags_to_migratetype(const gfp_t gfp_flags)
> {
> - WARN_ON((gfp_flags & GFP_MOVABLE_MASK) == GFP_MOVABLE_MASK);
> + VM_WARN_ON((gfp_flags & GFP_MOVABLE_MASK) == GFP_MOVABLE_MASK);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON((1UL << GFP_MOVABLE_SHIFT) != ___GFP_MOVABLE);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON((___GFP_MOVABLE >> GFP_MOVABLE_SHIFT) != MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
>
> if (unlikely(page_group_by_mobility_disabled))
> return MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE;
>
> /* Group based on mobility */
> - return (((gfp_flags & __GFP_MOVABLE) != 0) << 1) |
> - ((gfp_flags & __GFP_RECLAIMABLE) != 0);
> + return (gfp_flags & GFP_MOVABLE_MASK) >> GFP_MOVABLE_SHIFT;
I'm not sure the simplification of this line is worth the fragile
dependency between those two tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists