[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150925124933.GB3041@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:49:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] perf buildid: Cache kernel DSO created when reading
buildid header table
Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:54:52PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:56:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:12AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > Hi Arnaldo,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:42:28AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Namhyung,
> > > >
> > > > Can you take a look and perhaps give me your Acked-by?
> > >
> > > The dso->kernel and event->cpumode is always confusing for modules..
> >
> > Right, my idea is to delete dso->kernel, to remove this confusion.
>
> I'm fine with that. :)
>
>
> >
> > Please see my tmp.perf/core branch, there are a few patches there using
> > alternative methods in places previously using the botched dso->kernel.
> >
> > > In this case, it seems that mmap events set kernel cpumode but
> > > build-id events don't.
> >
> > in the previous sentence you think build-id events don't set
> > perf_event_attr.misc bits related to cpumode...
> >
> > > So kernel cpumode in a bulid-id event
> > > indicates that it is a kernel (vmlinux) dso, right?
> >
> > While here you ask if it does?
>
> I mean that cpumode is not set for modules, so if you see cpumode set,
> it should be the kernel dso..
>
>
> >
> > All these are synthesized, it is a matter of looking at the routines
> > synthesizing them :-)
>
> Right.
>
>
> >
> > > I'll test this tomorrow..
> >
> > Thanks, over time there were areas where multiple people touched and
> > added different semantics that are biting now, I'm trying to, while
> > fixing a bug, the one Wang Nan reported, clarify those things.
> >
> > It is taking more time than I antecipated, as I'm stumbling in what look
> > like other bugs in the perf-probe codebase :-/
>
> OK, after applying this patch, perf cannot find vmlinux anymore. It
> finds scsi_mod.ko.gz instead, resulting in no kernel symbols..
Thanks for checking, will reproduce and add a 'perf test' entry before
trying to continue the work in this patch...
- Arnaldo
> Before:
>
> $ perf report | grep -F '[k]' | head
> 0.44% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] clear_page_c
> 0.34% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] page_fault
> 0.22% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] get_page_from_freelist
> 0.22% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] handle_mm_fault
> 0.15% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __do_page_fault
> 0.13% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] unmap_single_vma
> 0.12% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __mem_cgroup_count_vm_event
> 0.11% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mem_cgroup_try_charge
> 0.11% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __d_lookup_rcu
> 0.11% cc1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] copy_user_generic_string
>
> After: (same data file but having no symbol affects the result)
>
> $ perf report | grep -F '[k]' | head
> 0.42% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff812b4077
> 0.33% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff8153f9d0
> 0.11% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff8117ec0c
> 0.10% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff812b443c
> 0.10% as scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff812b4077
> 0.08% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff811bbd90
> 0.07% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff811bf188
> 0.07% as scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff8153f9d0
> 0.06% sh scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff8153f9d0
> 0.06% cc1 scsi_mod.ko.gz [k] 0xffffffff811e0838
>
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have to time to look at it now. It's one of
> the biggest national holiday in Korea so maybe I can have a look later
> in next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists