[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g9TFnUK_=Nk+b3_QMX4nUiGN9RN1PnT2zwLv_NgLExLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:03:18 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] block, dax, pmem: reference counting infrastructure
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:41:55AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Enable DAX to use a reference count for keeping the virtual address
>> returned by ->direct_access() valid for the duration of its usage in
>> fs/dax.c, or otherwise hold off blk_cleanup_queue() while
>> pmem_make_request is active. The blk-mq code is already in a position
>> to need low overhead referece counting for races against request_queue
>> destruction (blk_cleanup_queue()). Given DAX-enabled block drivers do
>> not enable blk-mq, share the storage in 'struct request_queue' between
>> the two implementations.
>
> Can we just move the refcounting to common code with the same field
> name, and even initialize it for non-mq, non-dax queues but just never
> tage a reference there (for now)?
That makes sense to me, especially because drivers/nvdimm/blk.c is
broken in the same way as drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c and it would be
awkward to have it use blk_dax_get() / blk_dax_put(). The
percpu_refcount should be valid for all queues and it will only ever
be > 1 in the blk_mq and libnvdimm cases (for now). Will fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists