[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150925152017.GO16497@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:20:17 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make mem_cgroup_read_stat() unsigned
On Wed 23-09-15 00:21:33, Greg Thelen wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:42:13 -0700 Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> wrote:
[...]
> >> I assume it's pretty straightforward to create generic
> >> percpu_counter_array routines which memcg could use. Possibly something
> >> like this could be made general enough could be created to satisfy
> >> vmstat, but less clear.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg06216.html
> >> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/1057
> >
> > That all sounds rather bogus to me. __percpu_counter_add() doesn't
> > modify struct percpu_counter at all except for when the cpu-local
> > counter overflows the configured batch size. And for the memcg
> > application I suspect we can set the batch size to INT_MAX...
>
> Nod. The memory usage will be a bit larger, but the code reuse is
> attractive. I dusted off Vladimir's
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/11/710. Next step is to benchmark it
> before posting.
I am definitely in favor of using generic per-cpu counters.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists