[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZssaXik5XWZLoFXZWKWMsVWppOO85Q9QaXyHiaLUMWAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:01:24 -0700
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/22] gpio: Probe GPIO drivers on demand
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
> When looking up a gpiochip through its firmware node, probe it if it
> hasn't already.
>
> The goal is to reduce deferred probes to a minimum, as it makes it very
> cumbersome to find out why a device failed to probe, and can introduce
> very big delays in when a critical device is probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
That is if the whole thing goes in as-is for the GPIO parts.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists