[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443200946.32298.118.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:09:06 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC: 'Christophe Leroy' <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/25] powerpc/8xx: Map IMMR area with 512k page at a
fixed address
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 14:46 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Scott Wood
> > Sent: 24 September 2015 21:14
> > > Isn't this a more general problem?
> > >
> > > If there are multiple remap requests for the same physical page
> > > shouldn't the kernel be just increasing a reference count somewhere
> > > and returning address in the same virtual page?
> > > This should probably happen regardless of the address.
> > > I presume it must be done for cacheable mappings.
> >
> > Why would you assume that?
>
> Because 'really horrid (tm)' things happen on some cache
> architectures if you map the same physical address to
> multiple virtual addresses.
PPC is not such an architecture.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists