[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4331507.W3ZDWldbWu@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 22:26:22 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
QCA ath9k Development <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'
On Friday, September 25, 2015 11:52:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-09-15, 20:49, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Ok, then, but that means Rafael is completely wrong ...
> > debugfs_create_bool() takes a *pointer* and it needs to be long-lived,
> > it can't be on the stack. You also don't get a call when it changes.
>
> Ahh, ofcourse. My bad as well...
Well, sorry about the wrong suggestion.
> I think we can change structure definition but will wait for Rafael's
> comment before that.
OK, change the structure then.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists