linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make /dev/urandom scalable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150925202425.GA14209@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:24:25 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Epler <jepler@...ythonic.net>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make /dev/urandom scalable

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:07:54PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> 
> Interestingly, based on what dieharder is already saying about performance,
> /dev/urandom is slower than AES_OFB (at least, on this particular system,
> happy to provide hardware specs if someone wants).

Yeah, not surprised by that.  We're currently using a crypto hash
instead of AES, which means we're not doing any kind of hardware
acceleration.

Crazy applications that want to spend 100% of the CPU generating
random numbers instead of you know, doing _useful_ work
notwithstanding, /dev/urandom never had high performance as one of its
design goals.  The assumption was that if you needed that kind of
performance, you would use a user-space cryptographic random number
generator.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/