linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 059/159] NFSv4.1/pNFS: Fix borken function _same_data_server_addrs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150926205317.049116810@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:55:05 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 059/159] NFSv4.1/pNFS: Fix borken function _same_data_server_addrs_locked()

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>

commit 6f536936b79bd4b5cea8fb0e5b8b0bce8cd1ea4a upstream.

- Switch back to using list_for_each_entry(). Fixes an incorrect test
  for list NULL termination.
- Do not assume that lists are sorted.
- Finally, consider an existing entry to match if it consists of a subset
  of the addresses in the new entry.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs_nfs.c
@@ -359,26 +359,31 @@ same_sockaddr(struct sockaddr *addr1, st
 	return false;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Checks if 'dsaddrs1' contains a subset of 'dsaddrs2'. If it does,
+ * declare a match.
+ */
 static bool
 _same_data_server_addrs_locked(const struct list_head *dsaddrs1,
 			       const struct list_head *dsaddrs2)
 {
 	struct nfs4_pnfs_ds_addr *da1, *da2;
+	struct sockaddr *sa1, *sa2;
+	bool match = false;
 
-	/* step through both lists, comparing as we go */
-	for (da1 = list_first_entry(dsaddrs1, typeof(*da1), da_node),
-	     da2 = list_first_entry(dsaddrs2, typeof(*da2), da_node);
-	     da1 != NULL && da2 != NULL;
-	     da1 = list_entry(da1->da_node.next, typeof(*da1), da_node),
-	     da2 = list_entry(da2->da_node.next, typeof(*da2), da_node)) {
-		if (!same_sockaddr((struct sockaddr *)&da1->da_addr,
-				   (struct sockaddr *)&da2->da_addr))
-			return false;
+	list_for_each_entry(da1, dsaddrs1, da_node) {
+		sa1 = (struct sockaddr *)&da1->da_addr;
+		match = false;
+		list_for_each_entry(da2, dsaddrs2, da_node) {
+			sa2 = (struct sockaddr *)&da2->da_addr;
+			match = same_sockaddr(sa1, sa2);
+			if (match)
+				break;
+		}
+		if (!match)
+			break;
 	}
-	if (da1 == NULL && da2 == NULL)
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
+	return match;
 }
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/