linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.2 024/134] cxl: Fix unbalanced pci_dev_get in cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150926205313.210316124@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:54:36 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
	Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2 024/134] cxl: Fix unbalanced pci_dev_get in cxl_probe

4.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>

commit 2925c2fdf1e0eb642482f5b30577e9435aaa8edb upstream.

Currently the first thing we do in cxl_probe is to grab a reference
on the pci device. Later on, we call device_register on our adapter.
In our remove path, we call device_unregister, but we never call
pci_dev_put. We therefore leak the device every time we do a
reflash.

device_register/unregister is sufficient to hold the reference.
Therefore, drop the call to pci_dev_get.

Here's why this is safe.
The proposed cxl_probe(pdev) calls cxl_adapter_init:
    a) init calls cxl_adapter_alloc, which creates a struct cxl,
       conventionally called adapter. This struct contains a
       device entry, adapter->dev.

    b) init calls cxl_configure_adapter, where we set
       adapter->dev.parent = &dev->dev (here dev is the pci dev)

So at this point, the cxl adapter's device's parent is the PCI
device that I want to be refcounted properly.

    c) init calls cxl_register_adapter
       *) cxl_register_adapter calls device_register(&adapter->dev)

So now we're in device_register, where dev is the adapter device, and
we want to know if the PCI device is safe after we return.

device_register(&adapter->dev) calls device_initialize() and then
device_add().

device_add() does a get_device(). device_add() also explicitly grabs
the device's parent, and calls get_device() on it:

         parent = get_device(dev->parent);

So therefore, device_register() takes a lock on the parent PCI dev,
which is what pci_dev_get() was guarding. pci_dev_get() can therefore
be safely removed.

Fixes: f204e0b8cedd ("cxl: Driver code for powernv PCIe based cards for userspace access")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Acked-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
@@ -1124,8 +1124,6 @@ static int cxl_probe(struct pci_dev *dev
 	int slice;
 	int rc;

-	pci_dev_get(dev);
-
 	if (cxl_verbose)
 		dump_cxl_config_space(dev);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/