linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:53:01 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:	Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	stefan@...er.ch, maitysanchayan@...il.com, B38611@...escale.com,
	knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
	shawn.guo@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"fugang.duan@...escale.com" <fugang.duan@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation

On 23/09/15 14:43, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
> There is an observed temperature difference of ~20°C with the
> internal temperature reading and the temperature measured on
> SoC package. Existing calculations consider the typical values
> provided in datasheet. Those typical values are valid for
> VREFH_ADC at 3.0V. Voltage at 25°C is different for different
> VREFH_ADC voltages. With VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, voltage at 25°C is
> 0.699V. Hence update the VTEMP25 to 0.699V which gives ADCR@...p25
> as 867 and the final temperature readings differs with ~5°C from
> the external readings.
> 
> Formula for finding ADCR@...p25:
> ADCR@...p25 = (ADCR@Vdd * V@...P25 * 10) / VDDconv
> 
> ADCR@Vdd for 12-Bit ADC = 4095
> VDDconv = VREFH_ADC * 10
> 
> VREFH_ADC@...V
> ADCR@...p25 = (4095 * .699 * 10) / 33
> ADCR@...p25 ~= 867
> 
> | VREFH_ADC | V@...P25 | VDDconv | ADCR@...p25 |
> |   3.0V    | 0.696mV  |    30   |     950     |
> |   3.3V    | 0.699mV  |    33   |     867     |
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>
Looks fine to me, but I'll need an Ack from Fugang on this one
as I don't know or have the part I'm afraid.

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> index f4df2a7..e7abc13 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@
>  
>  #define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_TIME		1000
>  
> +/* V at 25°C of 696 mV */
> +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V0		950
> +/* V at 25°C of 699 mV */
> +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V3		867
> +/* Typical sensor slope coefficient at all temperatures */
> +#define VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF		1840
> +
>  enum clk_sel {
>  	VF610_ADCIOC_BUSCLK_SET,
>  	VF610_ADCIOC_ALTCLK_SET,
> @@ -636,11 +643,13 @@ static int vf610_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  			break;
>  		case IIO_TEMP:
>  			/*
> -			* Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000
> -			* Using sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C and
> -			* V at 25°C of 696 mV
> -			*/
> -			*val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - 864) * 1000000 / 1840;
> +			 * Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000
> +			 * Using the typical sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C
> +			 * and VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, V at 25°C of 699 mV
> +			 */
> +			*val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - VF610_VTEMP25_3V3) *
> +					1000000 / VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF;
> +
>  			break;
>  		default:
>  			mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/