[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWAVp34=BTjL53Mxx=c=Snyrw6-1NbitxkWrcLT22Q4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:58:22 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fix two more 4.3 regressions
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Paul E. McKenney
>>> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 08:28:39AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> as I have observed here some lockdep issues (one could be solved in
>>> >> netdev) I wanted to try this patchset.
>>> >>
>>> >> Unfortunately, you cannot pull from...
>>> >>
>>> >> "These changes are available in the git repository at:
>>> >>
>>> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git for-mingo
>>> >>
>>> >> for you to fetch changes up to 19a5ecde086a6a5287978b12ae948fa691b197b7:
>>> >>
>>> >> rcu: Suppress lockdep false positive for rcp->exp_funnel_mutex
>>> >> (2015-09-20 21:01:22 -0700)
>>> >>
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> Oleg Nesterov (1):
>>> >> rcu: Change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around GCC bug 67055
>>> >>
>>> >> Paul E. McKenney (1):
>>> >> rcu: Suppress lockdep false positive for rcp->exp_funnel_mutex
>>> >>
>>> >> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 +++++------
>>> >> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 +++++
>>> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)"
>>> >>
>>> >> So, I have stolen them from linux-next.git.
>>> >>
>>> >> Please look at this, Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > Does it work better now? (Forgot to actually push the new name...)
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> now for-mingo Git branch has this two fixes.
>>
>> Whew!!! Apologies for the hassle!
>>
>>> I just booted into my new kernel with the "stolen" rcu.fixes from -next.
>>>
>>> For the lockdep problems I will do a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y to see if
>>> I get some more infos on the workqueue trouble.
>>>
>>> [ 23.874836] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
>>> kernel/workqueue.c:2678
>>> [ 23.874902] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1411, name: acpid
>>
>> Did you get a stack trace? There are quite a few potential callers of
>> start_flush_work() via flush_work().
>>
>
> Hi Paul :-),
>
> Here is the stack trace.
>
> [ 23.045871] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/workqueue.c:2678
> [ 23.045982] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1399, name: acpid
> [ 23.046064] 3 locks held by acpid/1399:
> [ 23.046066] #0: (&evdev->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8174ac7c>]
> evdev_release+0xbc/0xf0
> [ 23.046081] #1: (&dev->mutex#2){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81742397>]
> input_close_device+0x27/0x70
> [ 23.046093] #2: (hid_open_mut){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0056388>]
> usbhid_close+0x28/0xb0 [usbhid]
> [ 23.046106] irq event stamp: 3306
> [ 23.046109] hardirqs last enabled at (3305): [<ffffffff8192ae32>]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x32/0x60
> [ 23.046115] hardirqs last disabled at (3306): [<ffffffff81121017>]
> del_timer_sync+0x37/0x110
> [ 23.046122] softirqs last enabled at (2704): [<ffffffff818b12c9>]
> local_bh_enable+0x9/0x20
> [ 23.046128] softirqs last disabled at (2702): [<ffffffff818b12a9>]
> local_bh_disable+0x9/0x20
> [ 23.046136] CPU: 2 PID: 1399 Comm: acpid Not tainted
> 4.3.0-rc3-3-llvmlinux-amd64 #1
> [ 23.046139] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
> [ 23.046143] ffff8800d36ee948 0000000000000092 0000000000000000
> ffff8800bbacfae8
> [ 23.046151] ffffffff8149adad ffff8800bbacfb18 ffffffff810cd1ea
> ffffffff81c56f0a
> [ 23.046158] ffff8800c22dc400 0000000000000000 0000000000000a76
> ffff8800bbacfb58
> [ 23.046165] Call Trace:
> [ 23.046172] [<ffffffff8149adad>] dump_stack+0x7d/0xa0
> [ 23.046177] [<ffffffff810cd1ea>] ___might_sleep+0x28a/0x2a0
> [ 23.046182] [<ffffffff810cceef>] __might_sleep+0x4f/0xc0
> [ 23.046187] [<ffffffff810afbff>] start_flush_work+0x2f/0x290
> [ 23.046192] [<ffffffff810afbac>] flush_work+0x5c/0x80
> [ 23.046195] [<ffffffff810afb6a>] ? flush_work+0x1a/0x80
> [ 23.046202] [<ffffffff810eed0d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
> [ 23.046206] [<ffffffff810aecc8>] ? try_to_grab_pending+0x48/0x360
> [ 23.046211] [<ffffffff8192ac53>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x73/0x80
> [ 23.046216] [<ffffffff810afff9>] __cancel_work_timer+0x179/0x260
> [ 23.046221] [<ffffffff8192add2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x52/0x80
> [ 23.046226] [<ffffffff81120fcd>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0xad/0xc0
> [ 23.046230] [<ffffffff810afe78>] cancel_work_sync+0x18/0x20
> [ 23.046237] [<ffffffffa00563d5>] usbhid_close+0x75/0xb0 [usbhid]
> [ 23.046245] [<ffffffffa00394d1>] hidinput_close+0x31/0x40 [hid]
> [ 23.046251] [<ffffffffa00394a0>] ? hidinput_open+0x40/0x40 [hid]
> [ 23.046256] [<ffffffff817423b8>] input_close_device+0x48/0x70
> [ 23.046261] [<ffffffff8174ac96>] evdev_release+0xd6/0xf0
> [ 23.046267] [<ffffffff812728c7>] __fput+0x107/0x240
> [ 23.046271] [<ffffffff81272756>] ____fput+0x16/0x20
> [ 23.046276] [<ffffffff810b945c>] task_work_run+0x6c/0xe0
> [ 23.046282] [<ffffffff81003aa7>] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x117/0x120
> [ 23.046287] [<ffffffff81003ce1>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x231/0x2a0
> [ 23.046292] [<ffffffff8126efa5>] ? filp_close+0x65/0x90
> [ 23.046298] [<ffffffff810ef1c9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x19/0x290
> [ 23.046303] [<ffffffff81003017>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x17/0x19
> [ 23.046308] [<ffffffff8192bb62>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f
>
> Can you give help on how to "debug" this?
>
> I switched from full-dynticks to simple cpu-accounting which did not help.
> But this was only a suspicion as Jiri pointed to the possibility
> del_timer_sync() could have get some mis-optimization.
>
> So, more empty head here.
>
Forgot to attach dmesg-log and my kernel-config.
Sorry about that.
- Sedat -
View attachment "dmesg_4.3.0-rc3-3-llvmlinux-amd64.txt" of type "text/plain" (63765 bytes)
Download attachment "config-4.3.0-rc3-3-llvmlinux-amd64" of type "application/octet-stream" (130207 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists